1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 626 N.W.2d
  5. 626 N.W.2d 198 (2001)
 

LOVEN v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

No. C5-00-1925.

626 N.W.2d 198 (2001)

Kari LOVEN, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, et al., Respondents, Federal Signal Corporation, et al., Defendants, and Kelsey Loven, a minor, by her father and natural guardian, Kyle A. Loven, and Kyle A. Loven, individually, Appellants, v. City of Minneapolis, et al., Respondents, and Jean M. Lanz, Appellant, v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendant, City of Minneapolis, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 15, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Ballentine, James R. Schwebel, Schwebel, Goetz Sieben, Minneapolis, MN, for appellants.

Jay M. Heffern, Minneapolis City Attorney, James A. Moore, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge, G. BARRY ANDERSON and PORITSKY, Judges.

OPINION

BERTRAND PORITSKY, Judge*

Appellants brought an action in district court seeking basic economic loss benefits from the respondent city of Minneapolis pursuant to the no-fault insurance act. Minn.Stat. § 65B.44 (1998). The district court ruled that the limits in the municipal tort liability law, Minn.Stat. § 466.04 (1998), applied to recovery of no-fault benefits from the city. Because we conclude as a matter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases