Ordered that the judgment and the resentence are affirmed.
The court did not err in denying the defendant's challenge of a prospective juror for cause. The record does not support a finding that the prospective juror possessed "a state of mind that [was] likely to preclude [her] from rendering an impartial verdict based upon evidence adduced at the trial" (CPL 270.20 [1] [b]), or that there was a substantial risk that she would be unable to discharge her responsibilities...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.