1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 162 F.Supp.2d
  5. 162 F.Supp.2d 649 (2001)
 

AD HOC COMMITTEE OF DOMESTIC URANIUM PROD. v. U.S.

SLIP OP. 01-103. No. 00-09-00450.

162 F.Supp.2d 649 (2001)

AD HOC COMMITTEE OF DOMESTIC URANIUM PRODUCERS, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Government of Uzbekistan and Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combinat, Defendant-Intervenors.

United States Court of International Trade.

August 14, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, Washington, DC (Valerie A. Slater, Stephen J. Claeys and Catherine J. Finnegan) for plaintiff.

Lyn M. Schlitt, General Counsel, James M. Lyons, Deputy General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC (Robin L. Turner) for defendant.

White & Case, LLP, Washington, DC (Carolyn B. Lamm and Adams C. Lee) for defendant-intervenor.

OPINION

RESTANI, Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion of plaintiff Ad Hoc Committee of Domestic Uranium Producers under United States Court of International Trade ("C.I.T.") Rule 56.2 for judgment upon the administrative record before the International Trade Commission ("Commission" or "ITC"). Plaintiff challenges the negative results as to Uzbekistan in the sunset review determination found in Uranium from Russia, Ukraine and Uzbekistan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases