The Court of Claims providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant's motion which was to compel the claimant to respond to interrogatories 9, 10, and 17 (see, Schobel v Godwin,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BAY ISLIP ASSOCIATES v. STATE OF NEW YORK
285 A.D.2d 522 (2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 897
BAY ISLIP ASSOCIATES, Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 16, 2001.
Decided July 16, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.