IN RE MARRIAGE OF SCHMITT v. SCHMITT

No. 00-0695.

242 Wis.2d 565 (2001)

2001 WI App 78

626 N.W.2d 14

IN RE the MARRIAGE OF: Kathleen M. SCHMITT, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Arnold C. SCHMITT, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided February 8, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the respondent-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Scott B. Rasmussen of Rasmussen Law Offices, Beaver Dam.

On behalf of the petitioner-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Julie M. Gay of Brenner, Brenner & Wall, LLP, Waukesha.

Before Dykman, P.J., Deininger and Leineweber, JJ.


¶ 1. DEININGER, J.

Arnold Schmitt appeals a divorce judgment, contending that the trial court erred by awarding him too little maintenance for a too limited time period. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in determining the amount or duration of maintenance. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. Arnold and Kathleen Schmitt filed this action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases