Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We reject the defendant's contention that a purported arrest report, allegedly containing information that was inconsistent with the testimony of the arresting officers, should have been admitted into evidence pursuant to the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see, CPLR 4518; CPL 60.10). The defendant failed to lay a proper foundation for its admission (see, People v Maisonave,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.