1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 286 A.D.2d
  5. 286 A.D.2d 444 (2001)
 

PEOPLE v. FERNANDEZ

286 A.D.2d 444 (2001)

730 N.Y.S.2d 234

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE FERNANDEZ, Also Known as JOSE FERNANDEZ MUNOZ, Also Known as JOSE MUNOZ, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided August 20, 2001.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant's claim that the prosecutor's allegedly improper comments during summation constituted reversible error is, for the most part, not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Tonge, 93 N.Y.2d 838; People v Scotti, 220 A.D.2d 543). In any event, the comments and conduct did not exceed permissible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases