1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 279 A.D.2d
  5. 279 A.D.2d 437 (2001)
 

DORFMAN ORGANIZATION, LTD. v. GREATER NEW YORK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

279 A.D.2d 437 (2001)

719 N.Y.S.2d 573

DORFMAN ORGANIZATION, LTD., Plaintiff, v. GREATER NEW YORK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellants. DORFMAN ORGANIZATION et al., Counterclaim Defendants-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 30, 2001.

Counterclaim defendants, as the insurance broker for the proposed insured, owed the insured, not counterclaim plaintiff insurers, a duty of care (see, American Motorists Ins. Co. v Salvatore, 102 A.D.2d 342, 345). In any event, the brokers did not possess knowledge superior to that of the insurers, and the brokers' assertion that the new account would be profitable and would double the brokers' account with the insurers was nonactionable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases