1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 138 F.Supp.2d
  5. 138 F.Supp.2d 565 (2001)
 

ADE CORP. v. KLA-TENCOR CORP.

No. CIV. A. 00-892-RRM.

138 F.Supp.2d 565 (2001)

ADE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

April 10, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Marsden, J. Andrew Huff, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Wilmington, DE, and Robert E. Hillman, Craig R. Smith, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Boston, MA, for Plaintiff, ADE Corporation.

Rudolf E. Hutz, Patricia Smink Rogowski, Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz LLP, Wilmington, DE, Michael H. Kalkstein, Chris Scott Graham, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Defendant KLA-Tencor Corporation.

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

This is a patent case. In a complaint filed on October 27, 2000, ADE Corporation alleges KLA-Tencor Corporation is infringing its patent. KLA has answered the complaint and counterclaimed, alleging ADE is infringing three of its patents. The case is currently scheduled for a two week jury trial beginning on Monday, March 4, 2002.

KLA has moved to transfer the case to the Northern District of California pursuant to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases