Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants refused to renew the plaintiff's contract of employment because she was cohabiting with a man who was married to another woman. The plaintiff commenced this action, claiming that the termination of her employment violated Labor Law § 201-d (2) (c), which bars an employer from discharging an employee because of the employee's legal recreational activities outside work hours. However, the plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.