1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 245 Wis.2d
  5. 245 Wis.2d 447 (2001)
 

STATE v. OAKLEY

No. 99-3328-CR.

245 Wis.2d 447 (2001)

2001 WI 103

629 N.W.2d 200

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David W. OAKLEY, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided July 10, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Timothy T. Kay and Kay & Kay Law Firm, Brookfield, and oral argument by Timothy T. Kay.

For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Thomas J. Balistreri, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general.

¶ 1. JON P. WILCOX, J.

This case presents two issues.1 First, we must decide whether as a condition of probation, a father of nine children, who has intentionally refused to pay child support, can be required to avoid having another child, unless he shows that he can support that child and his current children. We conclude that in light of Oakley's ongoing victimization of his nine children...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases