The court properly found that the parties' conduct during the performance of multiple schedules under a single "Master Lease," established that plaintiff was justified in relying on defendant's prior waiver of a requirement for timely notice of plaintiff's intent to exercise a $1 buy-out option to purchase the leased computer equipment at the end of the lease term. The court did not improperly consider parol evidence since the Uniform Commercial Code provides that where a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.