While it is true that the specifications charging petitioner with misconduct did not expressly state that petitioner caused the accident by negligently losing control of his vehicle, it was clear from the specifications that petitioner was being charged with negligently operating his vehicle. Accordingly, he had sufficient notice of the charges to enable him to adequately prepare his defense (see generally, Matter of Board of Educ. v Commissioner of Educ.,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.