1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 552 S.E.2d
  5. 552 S.E.2d 118 (2001)
 

GROPPER v. STO CORP.

Nos. A01A0377, A01A0667.

552 S.E.2d 118 (2001)

250 Ga. App. 820

GROPPER et al. v. STO CORPORATION et al. Renaissance Building Corporation, v. Kolbe & Kolbe Millwork Company, Inc. et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Reconsiderations Denied July 31, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rubin & Hoyt, Robert P. Hoyt, Cumming, for appellants (case no. A01A0377).

Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks, Paul A. Howell, Jr., John C. Amabile, Wood & Grant, Wayne Grant, Atlanta, for appellant (case no. A01A0667).

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, R. Wayne Bond, Jonathan B. Mason, John A. Thomson, Jr., Jimmy E. White, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, Stephen M. Schatz, Robert E. Jones, Kenneth M. Barre, Atlanta, for appellees (case no. A01A0377).

Ellis, Funk, Goldberg, Labovitz & Dokson, Donald J. Ellis, Atlanta, for appellee (case no. A01A0667).

POPE, Presiding Judge.

Gary R. and Vicki Rae Gropper filed claims arising from the use of synthetic stucco in the construction of their home. The defendants are STO Corporation, the manufacturer of the synthetic stucco product, or "Exterior Insulating Finishing System" (EIFS); Renaissance Building Corporation, the builder; and Evans Plastering Company, a subcontractor. The Groppers' building contract specified the use of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases