WIEDMANN v. MERILLAT INDUS.

No. 21477.

623 N.W.2d 43 (2001)

2001 SD 23

Lyle WIEDMANN, Claimant and Appellant, v. MERILLAT INDUSTRIES, Employer/Self-Insurer and Appellee.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided February 28, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margo Tschetter Julius of Groves, Julius & Simpson, Rapid City, SD, Attorneys for claimant and appellant.

Curtis S. Jensen and Frank Driscoll of DeMersseman Jensen, Rapid City, SD, Attorneys for employer/self-insurer and appellee.


GILBERTSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Lyle Wiedmann (Wiedmann) injured his back while working for Merillat Industries (Merillat). Wiedmann's petition for odd-lot benefits was denied. The circuit court affirmed the Department of Labor's denial because Wiedmann had refused to participate in a pain management program. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] Wiedmann began working for Merillat in June of 1987. He injured his back while working on March...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases