We do not agree with the trial court that the verdict in defendants' favor was against the weight of the evidence, since the paucity of plaintiff's proof with respect to the crucial issues permitted the jury fairly to conclude that plaintiff had not met his burden of proof (see, Niewieroski v National Cleaning Contrs.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BARNES v. TODD
285 A.D.2d 373 (2001)
728 N.Y.S.2d 450
WILLIAM BARNES, Respondent, v. GREGORY K. TODD et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 12, 2001.
Decided July 12, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.