Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt because the People failed to establish that she possessed the requisite criminal intent and misappropriated public assistance benefits in excess of $3,000. We disagree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.