The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning identification and credibility.
The court properly exercised its discretion in refusing to grant a nine-day adjournment, in an already lengthy trial, so that defendant could call a vacationing detective as a witness concerning a description he received. This evidence would have been cumulative...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.