The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning identification. The evidence supports the jury's conclusion that defendant acted with two unapprehended individuals to commit armed robbery, during the course of which one of the participants forcibly took a cellular phone from one of the complaining witnesses, which was not returned. Larcenous intent could be reasonably inferred from the totality...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.