The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. On the contrary, the evidence, which included a video surveillance tape, was overwhelming. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning identification and credibility.
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's mistrial motion based on a witness's inadvertent reference to a photographic identification of defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.