A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the trial court's finding, largely one of credibility, that defendant's noneconomic contributions during the period that plaintiff was in training were substantial, and justify an equal share in the value of his medical practice and enhanced earning capacity (see, Thoreson v Penthouse Intl.,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.