OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
The petitioner served the respondent with a petition dated August 15, 2000, containing one charge of professional misconduct against him. After a preliminary conference on October 5, 2000, and a hearing held on October 24, 2000, and October 31, 2000, the Special Referee sustained the charge. The petitioner now moves to confirm the Special Referee's report and to impose such discipline upon the respondent as the Court deems...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.