The motion court properly held that defendants were collaterally estopped from relitigating in this action the issues previously determined against them in arbitration. Defendants, in the arbitration they demanded, had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of whether they used their best efforts on plaintiffs' behalf in connection with their performance of their obligations under the parties' license and marketing agreement, and are thus collaterally estopped...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.