Defendant forfeited his right to be present at sentencing. Defendant's removal from the courtroom was justified by his disruptive interruptions of the proceedings and disregard of the court's repeated warnings that he would be removed if he persisted (see, People v Stroman,
The record, viewed as a whole and in the light of the presumption of regularity afforded to judicial...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.