Since the notice of entry of the November 22, 1999 order set forth an incorrect date of entry, its service was a nullity; accordingly, plaintiff's appeal was timely. The complaint was properly dismissed as against defendant doctor based upon plaintiff's failure to file a note of issue in response to his second 90-day demand, his showing that the disclosure plaintiff claimed was still outstanding had in fact been provided, and plaintiff's failure to submit an expert medical...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.