1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 284 A.D.2d
  5. 284 A.D.2d 237 (2001)
 

BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE BORO PARK VILLAGE-PHASE I CONDOMINIUM v. BORO PARK TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATES

284 A.D.2d 237 (2001)

726 N.Y.S.2d 606

BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE BORO PARK VILLAGE-PHASE I CONDOMINIUM, Plaintiff, v. BORO PARK TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATES et al., Defendants. (And Other Actions.) HARTMAN, ULE, ROSE & RATNER, L. L. P., Nonparty Appellant-Respondent; TRIEF & OLK, Nonparty Respondent-Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 21, 2001.

The Special Referee correctly determined that, based upon an agreement between the outgoing and incoming attorneys regarding the division of legal fees, a number of factors should be considered in apportioning the fee, including the work performed, the amount recovered, the quality of services, the circumstances of the case, the contributions of the respective attorneys toward achieving the outcome and the time spent on the case (see Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases