HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. GOLDEN

No. 99-P-38.

51 Mass. App. Ct. 465 (2001)

HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. CATHERINE GOLDEN & another.

Court of Appeals of Massachusetts, Middlesex.

May 3, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew Aloisi for the defendants.

John D. Boyle for the plaintiff.

Present: ARMSTRONG, C.J., KAPLAN, & GREENBERG, JJ.


KAPLAN, J.

On this appeal we apply the rule established in the Gamache and Rubinstein cases. Preferred Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gamache, 426 Mass. 93 (1997). Rubinstein v. Royal Ins. Co. of America, 429 Mass. 355 (1999). Those cases considered the question of responsibility for attorney's fees incurred by an insured in defending against his insurance company's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases