1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 284 A.D.2d
  5. 284 A.D.2d 232 (2001)
 

THOMPSON v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY

284 A.D.2d 232 (2001)

728 N.Y.S.2d 15

ERVIN THOMPSON et al., Appellants, v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided June 21, 2001.

A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the findings that the injuries in issue will not cause plaintiff any future pain and suffering and have not caused his wife any loss of consortium (see, Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 N.Y.2d 744). Aside from the laceration on plaintiff's head that required 10 stitches, all of the other objective medical evidence, including MRI's, CAT scans, x-rays and neurological tests, was negative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases