The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The minor discrepancies in the testimony of the undercover officer and the arresting officer were not of such significance as to lead to the belief that the police testimony that defendant was the seller of the drugs was either mistaken or contrived.
The court properly denied...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.