The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant's course of conduct, including assisting his companions in surrounding the victim, was inconsistent with that of a mere by-stander and warranted a reasonable inference of accessorial liability (see, Matter of Taalib B.,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.