Respondents found, after a hearing upon petitioner landlords' application for a Certification of No Harassment, that petitioners had harassed the tenants of their SRO by illegally locking them out, abusing them verbally, wrongfully refusing to offer them leases, failing to make necessary repairs, and failing to maintain the communal baths and toilet rooms in sanitary condition. Respondents further found that, by means of such harassment, petitioners intended to cause their...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.