1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 193 F.Supp.2d
  5. 193 F.Supp.2d 285 (2001)
 

VLT, INC. v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. 00-CV-11049-PBS.

193 F.Supp.2d 285 (2001)

VLT, INC. and Vicor Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Tyco Electronics Power Systems, Inc., and Tyco International Ltd., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

October 18, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul F. Ware, Jr., Douglas C. Doskocil, Daryl L. Wiesen, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, for plaintiffs.

Sarah C. Columbia, Choate, Hall & Stewart, Boston, MA, Thomas L. Secrest, Daniel S. Hulme, Fish & Neave, New York, NY, for Lucent Technologies, Inc., Tyco International Ltd., defendants.

Thomas L. Secrest, Daniel S. Hulme, Fish & Neave, New York, NY, for Tyco Electronics Power Systems, defendant.

PROCEDURAL ORDER RE: MOTION FOR ATTACHMENT

SARIS, District Judge.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 64 and Mass. R.Civ.P. 4.1(c), plaintiffs have moved for an attachment which defendants have vigorously opposed. After two non-evidentiary hearings under Markman, the Court has resolved the parties' dispute over the construction of claim one, and is ready to address attachment.

Lucent and Tyco request an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Mass.Civ.P. 4.1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases