The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. Defendant's agency defense was clearly disproved by the credible evidence, which included defendant's statement at the outset of the transaction that he and his codefendant were "working."
Defendant's challenge to the court's agency charge is unpreserved and we decline to review...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.