The contractor's president stated at deposition that the relevant contract is in its possession and would show whether it performed work at the location where plaintiff fell, yet, it never produced the contract. The failure to do so gives plaintiff and codefendant City an acceptable excuse for not having tendered evidentiary proof in admissible form countering the affidavit of the contractor's supervisor that the contractor did not perform work at the site where plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.