The court properly exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of an uncharged crime. The probative value of the uncharged theft outweighed its prejudicial effect, particularly after defendant elicited from the complainant a prior inconsistent statement that was capable of being explained by the complainant's confusing references to the instant and prior crimes (see, People v Sosa,
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.