The court's finding was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court's determinations concerning identification and credibility. To the extent that appellant is challenging the court's denial of his motion to suppress identification testimony, we conclude that the motion was properly denied because the showup was justified by its close spatial and temporal proximity to the crime...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.