1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 142 F.Supp.2d
  5. 142 F.Supp.2d 255 (2001)
 

U.S. v. OWENS

No. 3:99CR290 (EBB).

142 F.Supp.2d 255 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America v. Orville OWENS, a.k.a. "Ratty"; and Earl Josephs, a.k.a. "Quame"

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

April 12, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Ring, U.S. Attorney's Office, Hartford, CT, for Plaintiff.

Sarah A. Chambers, Paul F. Thomas, Federal Public Defender's Office, New Haven, CT, William H. Paetzold, Moriarty & Paetzold, Glastonbury, CT, for Defendants.

Ruling on Defendants' Motions to Suppress and Motion to Sever

BURNS, Senior District Judge.

Defendant Earl Josephs moves, pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b), to suppress all oral and written statements made by him to law enforcement officers on November 15, 1999 because they were obtained in violation of his constitutional rights. [Doc. No. 32] Similarly, Defendant Orville Owens moves to suppress all oral...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases