1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 140 F.Supp.2d
  5. 140 F.Supp.2d 195 (2001)
 

PRECISIONFLOW TECHNOLOGIES v. CVD EQUIPMENT

No. 1:99-CV-1536(NAM/DRH).

140 F.Supp.2d 195 (2001)

PRECISIONFLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, v. CVD EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Counter-Claimant; and Stainless Design Concepts, Ltd., Defendants. CVD Equipment Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Kevin Brady and John Does I—XV, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

April 9, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heslin & Rothenburg, P.C., Kevin Brady, Nicholas Mesiti, Lee Palmateer, Leo M. Loughlin, of counsel, Albany, NY, for PrecisionFlow Technologies, Inc.

Galgano & Burke, Daniel P. Burke, Thomas Galgano, of counsel, Happauge, NY, for CVD Equipment Corp. and Stainless Design Concepts, Ltd.

DeGraff, Foy, Holt-Harris & Kunz, LLP, Attorneys for CVD Equipment Corp. and Stainless Design Concepts, Ltd., Albany, James T. Potter, Kelly L. Munkwitz, Of Counsel.

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

MORDUE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The present objections by plaintiff, PrecisionFlow Technologies, Inc., ("PrecisionFlow") to a Memorandum-Decision and Order by Magistrate Judge David R. Homer dated December 27, 2000, imposing sanctions on PrecisionFlow and its counsel for failure to produce PrecisionFlow employees for deposition, arise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases