1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 128 F.Supp.2d
  5. 128 F.Supp.2d 103 (2001)
 

U.S. v. FARRAH

No. CRIM. 3:98CR146 AWT.

128 F.Supp.2d 103 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America v. Rhonda M. FARRAH

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

January 16, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James G. Genco, U.S. Attorney's Office, Hartford, CT, Barbara Bailey Jongbloed, Stephen C. robinson, U.S. Attorney's Office, New Haven, CT, for U.S., plaintiff.

F. Lee Bailey, Boston, MA, Kenneth J. Fishman, Fishman, Ankner & Horstmann, LLP, Boston, MA, Amy J. Horowitz, Horowitz, Spicer & Tallo LLC, Hartford, CT, Gerald B. Lefcourt, Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt, PC, New York City, Donald B. Marks, Marks & Brooklier, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant.

RULING ON MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

THOMPSON, District Judge.

Defendant, Rhonda M. Farrah, having been found guilty by a jury on all charges, moved for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. She contended (i) that her trial counsel had an undisclosed conflict of interest arising from his involvement in other litigation against the government; (ii) that there was a total breakdown of the attorney-client relationship...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases