1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 169 F.Supp.2d
  5. 169 F.Supp.2d 56 (2001)
 

RICHARDSON v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP.

No. 3:98CV492(WWE).

169 F.Supp.2d 56 (2001)

Elaine RICHARDSON and Heather Antedomenico, Plaintiffs v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

October 2, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Thomas Blake, Jr., West Haven, CT, for plaintiffs.

Jonathan B. Orleans, Zeldes, Needle & Cooper, Bridgeport, CT, Edward Cerasia, II, Proskauer Rose, Newark, NJ, for defendant.

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

This action concerns defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation's employment practice of locking employees in the store during its closing collection procedure. Plaintiffs Elaine Richardson and Heather Antedomenico allege that defendant's lock-in procedure violates the Connecticut General Statutes and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act ["FLSA"], and constitutes false imprisonment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases