1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 775 A.2d
  5. 775 A.2d 1261 (2001)
 

SCHUNDLER v. PAULSEN

775 A.2d 1261 (2001)

168 N.J. 446

Bret SCHUNDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Glenn R. PAULSEN, George R. Gilmore, Richard H. Bagger, Deforest B. Soaries, New Jersey Secretary of State, Sharon Young, Director of Election Law Enforcement Commission, Defendants-Respondents, and Michael J. Garvin, Atlantic County Clerk, Kathleen A. Donovan, Bergen County Clerk, Philip E. Haines, Burlington County Clerk, James Beach, Camden County Clerk, Angela F. Pulvino, Cape May County Clerk, Gloria Nuto, Cumberland County Clerk, Patrick McNally, Essex County Clerk, James Hogan, Gloucester County Clerk, Janet E. Haynes, Hudson County Clerk, Dorothy K. Tirpok, Hunterdon County Clerk, Catherine DiCostanzo, Mercer County Clerk, Elaine Flynn, Middlesex County Clerk, M. Claire French, Monmouth County Clerk, Joan Bramhall, Morris County Clerk, M. Dean Haines, Ocean County Clerk, Ronni Nochimson, Passaic County Clerk, Gilda T. Gill, Salem County Clerk, R. Peter Widin, Somerset County Clerk, Erma Gormley, Sussex County Clerk, Joanne Rajoppi, Union County Clerk, Terrance D. Lee, Warren County Clerk; Defendants, and Robert D. Franks, Intervenor-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 10, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, L.L.P., Newark, for appellant (Brian W. McAlindin and Jennifer A. Keller, on the brief).

John J. Farmer, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, for respondents, DeForest B. Soaries and Sharon Young (Mark J. Fleming, Assistant Attorney General, on the brief, Michael J. Haas, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Peretti, L.L.P., Morristown, for respondents, Glenn R. Paulsen, George R. Gilmore, and Richard H. Bagger (Anne M. Patterson, on the brief).

Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley, L.L.P., Trenton, for intervenor-respondent, Robert D. Franks (William E. Baroni, Jr., on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

This matter has come before the Court on an appeal as of right that alleges several constitutional violations. R. 2:2-1(a)(1). In light of the need for a prompt disposition of the matter, the parties have submitted briefs on an accelerated schedule pursuant to our Order of May 9, 2001, and the Court has elected, pursuant to Rule 2:11-1(b), to dispose of the appeal without oral argument. In addition, the Court has carefully reviewed the record...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases