1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 166 F.Supp.2d
  5. 166 F.Supp.2d 19 (2001)
 

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM VETMEDICA v. SCHERING-PLOUGH

Civ. No. 96-4047(HAA).

166 F.Supp.2d 19 (2001)

BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM VETMEDICA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and Schering Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

September 21, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Curtis Meanor, Gregory D. Miller, Podvey, Sachs, Meanor, Catenacci, Hildner & Cocoziello, Newark, NJ, Jennifer Gordon, Jonathan A. Marshall, Mr. Scott D. Stimpson, Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, for Plaintiffs.

Sidney David, Paul H. Konchanski, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, Westfield, NJ, for Defendants.

AMENDED OPINION

ACKERMAN, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the court upon motions of Defendants Schering-Plough Corporation and Schering Corporations ("Schering" or "defendants") for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial. Plaintiff, Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., ("Boehringer" or "plaintiff") opposes these motions. For the reasons stated below, these motions are DENIED.

Background

A. Factual Background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases