1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 782 A.2d
  5. 782 A.2d 950 (2001)
 

STATE v. CARLSON

782 A.2d 950 (2001)

344 N.J. Super. 521

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Terrance CARLSON and Jeanette Leehr, Defendants-Respondents. Irving D. Isko, Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 29, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Schechner, West Orange, argued the cause for appellant Irving D. Isko (Schechner & Targan, attorneys; Mr. Schechner, on the brief).

David L. Epstein, Roseland, argued the cause for respondents Terrance Carlson and Jeanette Leehr (Post, Polak, Goodsell & MacNeill, attorneys; Mr. Epstein, of counsel; Mr. Epstein and Joseph Tripodi, on the brief).

Fred Semrau argued the cause for respondent Borough of Mendham (Jansen, Bucco & DeBona, attorneys; Mr. Semrau, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN and EICHEN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, P.J.A.D.

Irving D. Isko, designated "a person interested in the prosecution," purports to appeal from an order of June 30, 2000, denying his request for appointment as "Special Municipal Prosecutor" to appeal the defendants' successful disposition of their municipal appeal to the Law Division and "reversal" of the municipal convictions. Isko argues that "the application to intervene as private prosecutor met all the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases