1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 765 A.2d
  5. 765 A.2d 745 (2001)
 

SGRO v. ROSS

765 A.2d 745 (2001)

166 N.J. 338

Antonio SGRO, M.D. and Ermelinda Sgro, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Richard S. ROSS, M.D., Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 14, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin T. McDonough, Woodstown, argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Mc-Donough, attorney; Antonio Sgro, pro se, on the brief).

Timothy M. Crammer, Linwood, argued the cause for respondent (Paarz, Master, Koernig, Crammer, O'Brien, Bishop & Horn, attorneys; Mr. Crammer and Joseph L. Marczyk, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

This is a medical malpractice informed consent case. Several days following a cataract operation performed by respondent Dr. Richard Ross ("Dr. Ross") on petitioner Dr. Antonio Sgro ("Sgro"), sutures in Sgro's eye became unraveled and a portion of his iris prolapsed from the eye. After discovering the complication, Dr. Ross reposited the iris and re-sutured the eye. Dr. Ross did not inform Sgro that he could have excised the exposed portion of the iris...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases