1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 131 F.Supp.2d
  5. 131 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2001)
 

DEMARCO v. DEPOTECH CORP.

No. 98-CV-0675 W (POR).

131 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2001)

Vincent M. DEMARCO, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. DEPOTECH CORPORATION; Edward L. Erickson; Sinil Kim, et al. Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

March 2, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William S. Lerach, Jan Adler, Laura M. Andracchio, Amber L. Eck, Millberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & Lerach LLP, San Diego, for Plaintiffs.

William F. Sullivan, Christopher H. McGrath, Kimberly S. Steckling, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP, San Diego, for Defendants.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' APPLICATION TO AMEND JUDGMENT

WHELAN, District Judge.

On February 9, 2001 Defendants Depotech Corporation, et al. ("Defendants") moved ex parte to amend this Court's judgment dated January 26, 2001 (hereinafter "judgment"). (Doc. No. 100.) Specifically, Defendants request that this Court amend its judgment to include findings under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs timely opposed. For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases