Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
On appeal from a judgment convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.15 [4]), the sole contention of defendant is that his statements should have been suppressed as the product of an unlawful vehicle "stop," in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. Supreme Court granted that part of defendant's motion seeking suppression of the tangible evidence seized but refused...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.