1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 35 P.3d
  5. 35 P.3d 89 (2001)
 

IN RE MARRIAGE OF ROBINSON AND THIEL

No. 2 CA-CV 99-0203.

35 P.3d 89 (2001)

201 Ariz. 328

In re the MARRIAGE OF David M. ROBINSON, Petitioner/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Angella S. THIEL (fka Robinson), Respondent/Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division Two, Department B.

November 20, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Natalie Wright, Tucson, for Petitioner/Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Liberty, O'Neill and Bibbens, By Pamela A. Liberty, Tucson, for Respondent/Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

OPINION

DRUKE, J.

¶ 1 This appeal presents two issues not previously addressed in Arizona: whether a trial court should include vested employee stock options in calculating child support and, if so, when and how the court should value them. We hold that vested employee stock options constitute income for purposes of calculating child support under the 1996 Arizona Child Support Guidelines. A.R.S. § 25-320 app. We decline, however, to adopt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases