Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant was convicted following a jury trial of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05), petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25), and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 165.40). Defendant contends that his right to counsel was violated because his attorney was not present in the Grand Jury room when he executed his waiver of immunity (see, People v Kirk...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.