1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 29 P.3d
  5. 29 P.3d 1199 (2001)
 

HOLDNER v. HOLDNER

97-2188; A104337

29 P.3d 1199 (2001)

176 Or. App. 111

Randal W. HOLDNER, Appellant, v. William F. HOLDNER and Patricia Holdner, Respondents. Patricia Holdner, Counterclaim-Plaintiff, v. Randal W. Holdner, Counterclaim-Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 15, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Markowitz argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Lynn R. Stafford and Markowitz, Herbold, Glade & Mehlhaf, P.C., Portland.

Thomas A. Bittner argued the cause for respondent Patricia Holdner. With him on the brief was Schulte, Anderson, Downes, Aronson & Bittner, P.C., Portland.

No appearance by respondent William Holdner.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and BREWER, Judges.

BREWER, J.

Plaintiff Randal Holdner appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants William and Patricia Holdner.1 Randal is the son of William and Patricia. Shortly before the trial of his parents' marital dissolution action, Randal brought this action against both of them, seeking a judicial declaration recognizing and enforcing an oral contract between himself and his parents. Randal alleged that he

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases