NATALE v. KISLING


764 A.2d 463 (2001)

336 N.J. Super. 198

Marie R. NATALE and Gregory Natale, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michele H. KISLING and GECAL, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 9, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George A. Mauro, Jr., Somerville, argued the cause for appellants (Mauro, Savo, Camerino & Grant, attorneys; Mr. Mauro, on the brief).

John T. Bazzurro, Red Bank, argued the cause for respondents (Wolff, Helies, Duggan, Spaeth & Lucas, attorneys; Mr. Bazzurro on the brief).

Before NEWMAN and WELLS.


This opinion of the court was delivered by WELLS, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Marie Natale, suffered personal injury as the result of a rear end motor vehicle collision on November 9, 1996. In the lawsuit which followed defendant asserted that the action was barred by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8, the verbal threshold statute and, after discovery was complete, filed a motion to dismiss on that ground. The motion judge granted the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases